bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: perl 5.20 test failures


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: perl 5.20 test failures
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:42:07 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)

Svante Signell, le Tue 19 Aug 2014 07:05:34 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 11:31 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > Furthermore the following two large file system tests fail when building 
> > manually:
> > (on the buildd they are skipped. How come, is that image not compiled with
> > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64?):
> > t/op/lfs.t
> > not ok 17
> > # Failed test 17 - at op/lfs.t line 229
> > #      got "big"
> > # expected "\000\000\000"
> > and
> > ../ext/Fcntl/t/syslfs.t ........................................... 1/? 
> > #   Failed test at t/syslfs.t line 230.
> > #          got: 'big'
> > #     expected: ''
> > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 17.
> > ../ext/Fcntl/t/syslfs.t ........................................... 
> > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
> > Failed 1/17 subtests
> > 
> > I can submit bugs with patches to skip these two tests, OK?
> 
> Samuel, you did not comment on this one. Is the buildd hurd built
> without _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 set?

I don't really have an opinion on this.  There is nothing particular in
the buildds environment which would set or unset _FILE_OFFSET_BITS.

Samuel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]