[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate |
Date: |
Tue, 6 May 2014 15:26:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:25:38 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> > > >
> > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > > For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault
> > > > > when
> > > > > run in the build tree: make, sh or something else, the test commands
> > > > > are
> > > > > rather hard to track.
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't that dump a core? Do you have /servers/crash properly pointing
> > > > to /servers/crash-dump-core and ulimit -u set to unlimited?
> > >
> > > fsysopts /servers/crash
> > > ext2fs --writable --no-inherit-dir-group --store-type=typed device:hd0s1
> >
> > See the type of file, it's a symlink, so just ls -l it.
>
> ls -l /servers/crash
> lrw-r--r-- 1 root root 10 May 17 2013 /servers/crash -> crash-kill
>
> Should I just ln -sf to change?
Yes.
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, (continued)
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate,
Samuel Thibault <=
- patch1.diff updated + test results Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/07
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/16
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/16
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/16
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/20
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/21
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/21
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/21
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02