[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:03:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 17 Apr 2014 00:03:45 +0200, a écrit :
> Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 09 Apr 2014 09:36:42 +0200, a écrit :
> > Well, the first step is to verify that TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET
> > and similar configury is correct for the Hurd,
>
> I have added the corresponding field, so we can just use the same offset
> as on Linux.
I have uploaded packages on http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/ so
Svante can try setting TARGET_THREAD_SPLIT_STACK_OFFSET to 0x30 with
them.
Samuel
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/04
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/04/09
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/16
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/04/24
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Justus Winter, 2014/04/26
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/04/26
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Justus Winter, 2014/04/26