[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New procfs implementation
From: |
Thomas Schwinge |
Subject: |
Re: New procfs implementation |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:03:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) |
Hi!
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:35:10 +0200, I wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
> > I have been working on a rewrite of procfs.
>
> Cool, thanks!
>
> > $ git remote add jk git://github.com/jeremie-koenig/hurd.git
> > $ git fetch jk
> > $ git checkout jk/procfs # Add "-b procfs" to create a local branch.
>
> I put it into <http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/procfs.git/>, branch
> jkoenig/master, as a stand-alone module. (Builds just with make; nice.)
I have now promoted this branch from jkoenig/master to master -- it is
the procfs variant that we've been using ever since, and the two
different branches recently confused Richard.
Open issues are tracked on
<http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/translator/procfs/jkoenig/discussion.html>,
by the way.
> Please continue to maintain the code in procfs.git, or alternatively I'll
> try to periodically pick the commits from your previous repository.
>
>
> > The Hurd branch above has been cleaned up, but if you're interested in
> > the "true" history, my old standalone repository is still lying around:
> >
> > http://github.com/jeremie-koenig/procfs
>
> Do you think it's worthwhile to archive this as
> [procfs.git]/jkoenig/early_development or something? Alternatively, I
> suggest to shut down repositories / branches that have been dealt with,
> to avoid confusion and too much scattering.
>
>
> In the future, please consider to use Savannah hurd Git repositories from
> the beginning, see
> <http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/source_repositories.html> for some
> documentation.
Grüße,
Thomas
pgp2KBkn5EEmP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: New procfs implementation,
Thomas Schwinge <=