[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
tmpfs status
From: |
Maksym Planeta |
Subject: |
tmpfs status |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:31:45 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
I'm currently working on getting tmpfs work on the Hurd. I already asked
on IRC to make or suggest some test for tmpfs. Last time Thomas Schwinge
suggested me to compile packages and thanks to that a found some bugs.
Now they are seems to be fixed, so I ask once more to make/suggest some
tests. Current version tmpfs is available in my branch in GNU/HURD git
repository[1].
I also made some performance tests. First was measuring time of working
command "apt-get source elinks". Approximately half time of working of
this command takes extracting files from archive. Second test was
measuring time for command "dpkg-buildpackage -b -nc". I've tested
tmpfs, ext2fs that mounted on ramdisk and usual ext2fs. Results are in
following table:
apt-get dpkg-buildpackage
ramfs+ext2fs 22s 50m
ext2fs 32s 46m
tmpfs 16s 47m
So, although tmpfs has advantage in speed, it doesn't give much gain in
task, like compiling packages.
1. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/hurd/hurd.git/log/?h=mplaneta/tmpfs/master
- tmpfs status,
Maksym Planeta <=
- Re: tmpfs status, Thomas Schwinge, 2012/03/26
- Re: tmpfs status, Samuel Thibault, 2012/03/26
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/03/28
- Re: tmpfs status, Thomas Schwinge, 2012/03/28
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/03/28
- Re: tmpfs status, Thomas Schwinge, 2012/03/28
- Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/03/29
Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/03/27
Re: tmpfs status, Maksym Planeta, 2012/03/27
Re: tmpfs status, Samuel Thibault, 2012/03/26