Re: fork: mach_port_mod_refs: EKERN_UREFS_OWERFLOW

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hello!

I hit this again.

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 01:22:05AM +0100, I wrote:
> Should refs have simply been initialized to zero (as the zero value is
> noneffective, and we'll set the ss->thread, etc. values later on)?

At the moment, I don't have the time to analyze this further, but I'll
simply give this glibc code change a try, and re-run the GCC testsuite
afterwards.


Samuel: what is the correct invocation to only build one flavor of the
Debian glibc binary packages, that is, don't build the 686 and xen ones,
but only good 'ol libc0.3?


Regards,
 Thomas

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature