[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer
From: |
Sergiu Ivanov |
Subject: |
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:32:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hello,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:14:10PM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 06:32:41PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net
> > wrote:
>
> > > These are probably all related. It's all part of the network
> > > virtualization project.
> >
> > I see. The question, then, is whether it is appropriate to push the
> > whole Hurd source tree with Zheng's changes to the incubator, or would
> > it be better to have a separate repository for that?
>
> I don't see why it should go into the incubator at all. Just put it on a
> branch in the main repository -- like it was in CVS.
Taking into consideration the fact that I have Zheng's project as a
modified Hurd repository, the idea would be to create a new branch in
hurd.git and migrate the git repository I have to that new branch.
There's still a question unanswered in my mind: when Thomas gave me
the Hurd repository with Zheng's changes, he told that he intended to
do something with this repository, but I don't remember what
exactly. May it be true that Thomas has already pushed this
repository somewhere?
Regards,
Sergiu
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, (continued)
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/23
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/23
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Da Zheng, 2009/12/24
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/24
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/26
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Da Zheng, 2009/12/27
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/28
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer,
Sergiu Ivanov <=
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/23