Re: filter naming

[Sergiu Ivanov]

Hello,

On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 12:13:30AM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 05:15:30PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> 
> > Also, IIRC, the filter is expected to be run via symbolic links and
> > extract the name of the translator to be filtered out from its command
> > line arguments (I mean argv[0]);
> 
> BTW, I concluded by now that it's probably nicer not to hard-code that
> functionality in the filter itself, but rather use a simple wrapper that
> does this...

Hm, I guess this is something we yet have to discuss.  It would be
great if we did this at the coming meeting.
 
> > in this case the real name of the filter is not extremely important,
> > since the final user will rarely use that name.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> Still would be good to have something expressive :-)

I have nothing against expressive names :-) Do you already have
something on your mind?

Regards,
scolobb