Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add the ``--mount'' command line option

[Sergiu Ivanov]

Hello,

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> I skimmed through this patch and noticed some issues with the license.
> 
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:10:24PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > >From d0f0f5c41d9046aec765a7264914c19642adead9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Sergiu Ivanov <unlimitedscolobb@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:22:24 +0300
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add the ``--mount'' command line option.
> > 
> > +++ b/unionmount.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > +/* Hurd unionmount
> > +   The core of unionmount functionality.
> > +
> > +   Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > +
> > +   Written by Sergiu Ivanov <unlimitedscolobb@gmail.com>.
> > +
> > +   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > +   modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version
> > +   2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> 
> This should be:
> 
>    This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>    modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>    as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
>    of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> 
> Note the ``or any later version'' part.

Yes, it initially was like that, but Thomas told me that the idea
about later versions is implied... (or, actually, it was how I
understood his remark about the ``implied *'').

So, frankly speaking, I'm waiting for Thomas to clarify things...
 
> > +   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > +   along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> > +   Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307
> > +   USA.  */
> 
> I remember being told that the address has changed when I was working
> on libchannel.  And indeed the address is different in my libchannel
> source:
> 
>    If not, write to the Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge,
>    MA 02139, USA.
> 
> I think your using the old address but I'm not sure.  Thomas will have
> to clarify.  Perhaps there is a definitive source somewhere.

Hm, nice... I've never heard of that change... I'll wait for what
Thomas should say, if you don't mind...

Thank you very much for the information :-)
 
Regards,
scolobb