[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New machine for shitbox
From: |
Dani Doni |
Subject: |
Re: New machine for shitbox |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jul 2008 13:21:29 +0200 |
On 7/5/08, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net <olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net> wrote:
Hi folks,
> On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it
> for the wiki exclusively would be a waste...
> Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two
> distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)
Maybe using web caching software like memcached[1] can help minimize
disk access, as wiki content could be served from memory and only
updates would hit the database triggering a cache update. In a such
configuration, an alternate VM dedicated to serve wiki pages
would/should consume very little resources.
[1] http://www.danga.com/memcached/
--
Dani
Doni
- New machine for shitbox, Barry deFreese, 2008/07/03
- Re: New machine for shitbox, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/07/04
- Re: New machine for shitbox,
Dani Doni <=
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Samuel Thibault, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Dani Doni, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Samuel Thibault, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Dani Doni, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/07/08
Re: New machine for shitbox / wiki system, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/07/08