[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Viengoos (was: client-side memory buffers)
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Viengoos (was: client-side memory buffers) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:44:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 02:18:18PM -0600, Joshua Stratton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Neal H. Walfield <neal@walfield.org>
> wrote:
> > At Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:01:25 -0600, Joshua Stratton wrote:
> > > Do you think the client-side memory model is worthwhile? And
> > > would the server allocating the memory passing it to the client
> > > using the Mach semantics allow this client-side memory model while
> > > avoiding the ability for clients to unmap the data?
> >
> > Yes, I think such accounting is worthwhile, it is what I am doing
> > with Viengoos, however, I question the ability to realize it using
> > Mach's interfaces.
>
>
> What's Viengoos? Is that a new microkernel?
Kind of. It's what presently lives in the hurd-l4/ module of the Hurd
CVS. It's an experimental kernel Neal uses for his research work.
Presently it's not standalone, but instead misuses L4 as a hardware
abstraction...
-antrik-
- Re: client-side memory buffers, (continued)
- Re: client-side memory buffers, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/04/01
- Re: client-side memory buffers, Joshua Stratton, 2008/04/01
- Re: client-side memory buffers, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/04/01
- Re: client-side memory buffers, Joshua Stratton, 2008/04/01
- Re: client-side memory buffers, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/04/02
- Re: client-side memory buffers, Joshua Stratton, 2008/04/02
- Viengoos (was: client-side memory buffers),
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: client-side memory buffers, Joshua Stratton, 2008/04/03
- Re: client-side memory buffers, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/04/02