[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thread model
From: |
Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: Thread model |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:56:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:58:57 -0400,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> And throwing a big wrinkle into all that is that many architectures do
> not make it *possible* for users to handle page faults. The processor
> dumps a load of crap on the stack, and the kernel must preserve it
> carefully and then return the fault. It is very hard to encapsulate
> that so that it can be stored and restored by users without keeping the
> whole stack around.
L4 was ported to a large number of architectures; it can't be that
hard.
- Re: Thread model, (continued)
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/12
- Re: Thread model, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/03/12
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/12
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/18
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model,
Neal H. Walfield <=
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/03/20
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/20
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/03/17
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/18
- Re: Thread model, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/03/19
- Re: Thread model (was: Ext2 superblock fault), Samuel Thibault, 2008/03/11