Re: GPLv3 and Hurd? (also a possible license violation)

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 18:49 -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I did cite one such case already, from cons.c (it appears in quite a  
> few other files as well), and Thomas cited one as well.
> 
> (3) all advertising
> * materials mentioning features or use of this software display the  
> following
> * acknowledgement: ``This product includes software developed by the
> * Computer Systems Laboratory at the University of Utah.''

I didn't see that in your post.  As Roland said, we have friends at
Utah, and there is every reason to think they will simply give us
permission to remove the naxious advertising clause.  Let's proceed on
the assumption that this is true for now.

Roland, can you talk to Jay or whoever is appropriate?

Thomas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part