[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pthread headers
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: pthread headers |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:33:21 +0100 |
> I was under the impression that __inline is an alias for
> inline, with no semantic differences.
>
> Then you have been under the wrong impression.
>
> ,----[ (gcc)C Dialect Options ]
> | The alternate keywords `__asm__', `__extension__', `__inline__' and
> | `__typeof__' continue to work despite `-ansi'.
> `----
You missed my point.
You weren't making any point, I was correcting your impression as to
the difference between __inline__ and inline.
- pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/10
- Re: pthread headers, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Roland McGrath, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, James A. Morrison, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/01/11
- Re: pthread headers, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
Re: pthread headers, pietro, 2005/01/11