[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rc & runsystem
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: rc & runsystem |
Date: |
18 Dec 2004 13:12:32 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu> writes:
> But there are perfectly valid reasons to edit /libexec/rc, and as such
> it should be classifed as a configuration file. If so, it should get
> the same treatment as /etc/motd and friends get right now.
"Configuration file" is a Debian thing, not a GNU thing. You are
applying the Debian package management standards to something which is
actually not Debian.
- Re: rc & runsystem, (continued)
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/25
- Re: rc & runsystem, Neal H. Walfield, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Roland McGrath, 2004/12/17
- Re: rc & runsystem, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2004/12/18
- Re: rc & runsystem, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2004/12/25
Re: rc & runsystem, Harley D. Eades III, 2004/12/16