[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: exec and EXECSERVERS
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: exec and EXECSERVERS |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:02:01 +0100 |
> What was the reason for disabling EXECSERVERS in exec? I think that
> it is quite an useful feature when debugging exec, or playing around
> with new features for it.
This[1] thread might interest you.
[1] http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-hurd/2000-May/001211.html
Interesting. Roland and/or Thomas, could you comment on the possible
security risks, if any such existed with EXECSERVERS?
- exec and EXECSERVERS, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Paul Jarc, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Paul Jarc, 2002/12/19
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Paul Jarc, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Roland McGrath, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/20
- Re: exec and EXECSERVERS, Roland McGrath, 2002/12/20