[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unionfs
From: |
Moritz Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: Unionfs |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Dec 2002 09:04:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Wolfgang Jaehrling <pro-linux@gmx.de> writes:
> /usr/bin/ld: netfs.o(.debug_info+0x6399): unresolvable relocation
> against symbol `_netfs_translator_callback1'
I am not sure what this is; I don't see it here.
> I noticed that lnode_ref_remove() and lnode_uninstall() recursively
> call each other, where lnode_uninstall() calls lnode_ref_remove() on
> node->dir, which should be locked; I could not find anything that
> indicates that it will be.
Hmm, I will look into that.
> Also, I find it a bit unfortunate that a simple `ls' triggers this
> already:
>
> wj@hurd:~/unionfs$ settrans -ac foo unionfs .. /
> wj@hurd:~/unionfs$ ls foo/unionfs/
> ls: foo/unionfs/foo: Too many levels of symbolic links
Of course; that is exactly the problem we were speaking about on IRC.
If you would be allowed to lookup foo/unionfs/foo, this would lead to
endless recursion - wouldn't be so nice for e.g. the locatedb-find
process.
Thanks for your comments.
moritz
--
moritz@duesseldorf.ccc.de - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
- Unionfs, Moritz Schulte, 2002/12/07
- Re: Unionfs, Wolfgang Jaehrling, 2002/12/08
- Re: Unionfs,
Moritz Schulte <=