bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.


From: Tom Hart
Subject: Re: 2nd attemt at reviving the filesystem limit discussion.
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:52:52 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1

Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 05:46:13PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
The reason for the limit is because the address space on IA32 architecture
is 32 bit.  Now, you _could_ of course change the kernel interfaces to allow
for larger memory objects and only limit mapping windows to 4gb.  This might


Or you could just use a 64bit machine such as an alpha ? :)

Always looking for a hardware solution to a software problem,

So then the problem goes away *for now*. Remember that hard drive sizes have this habit of doubling every year or so. Isn't this a re-statement of "640 K ought to be enough for anyone"?

--
    _______________________________________________
   /                                               |
  /  Tom Hart                                      |
 |   hartte13@BrandonU.ca                          |
  \  "rmTFM - Build consistent interfaces."        |
   \_______________________________________________|





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]