Re: GNU/Linux binary compatibility (Was: Re: memory_object_lock_request and memory_object_data_return fnord)

[Jeroen Dekkers]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:23:15PM +0100, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> * [Wolfgang J?hrling] 
> 
> > might even introduce a security problem. Thus we would need to recompile
> > all programs anyway. I can't see the point of having binary
> > compatiblity then.
> 
> If a user just wants to play Quake V or Duke Nukem Forever, he might not
> need to care about PATH_MAX, as these programs will most likely only
> open trusted files.

Then we recompile it. Oh, I don't care about non-free software at all.

Jeroen Dekkers
-- 
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects

pgpN0gSi79IWq.pgp
Description: PGP signature