[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: term & user space console
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: term & user space console |
Date: |
31 Jan 2002 15:35:51 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
Marcus Brinkmann <Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:00:37PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > I can make such requests, but how do I find out that the carrier really
> > > has
> > > been established? (Also, it would not allow servers to implement the open
> > > behaviour but not the tiocl bit mangling).
> >
> > Yeah, you are correct here. You could assert DTR with the direct bit
> > frobbing things, but you also need to block until CTS/CD goes on. The
> > modem bit ioctls have to blocking mechanism for this.
>
> I don't understand the last sentence in this paragraph.
Ah, well it's not even a proper sentence.
I mean "The modem bit ioctls have no blocking mechanism for this."
- Re: term & user space console, (continued)
- Re: term & user space console, Niels Möller, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Roland McGrath, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Roland McGrath, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: term & user space console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31
- Re: term & user space console, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/01/31