Re: [PATCH] part type interface

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Roland McGrath <roland@gnu.org> writes:

> Hmm, I think I prefer the status quo.  In a program that wants to use it,
> you can write an autoconf test for store_part_create, or use #pragma weak
> if you want a runtime test.
> 
> If we have stub function, I think ENOSYS is the right error for it to return.

Hrm.  Am I missing something?

I was thinking this code might be triggered by a user who requested a
store_part on the command line to, say, ext2fs.  Is that incorrect?