[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] part type interface
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] part type interface |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 15:36:40 -0400 (EDT) |
Hmm, I think I prefer the status quo. In a program that wants to use it,
you can write an autoconf test for store_part_create, or use #pragma weak
if you want a runtime test.
If we have stub function, I think ENOSYS is the right error for it to return.
- [PATCH] part type interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface,
Roland McGrath <=
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Neal H Walfield, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] part type interface, Roland McGrath, 2001/10/07