bug#31142: guix package --upgrade reverses the order of packages

[Pierre Neidhardt]

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> At first sight, to me, it’s not entirely clear how to determine whether
> something is to be upgraded in the presence of propagated inputs.

I think the linked discussion suggested we checked upgrades
recursively.  Wouldn't that work?

> And more importantly, I think the “imperative” model is necessarily not
> as expressive and “clean” as ‘--manifest’.  There are tradeoffs to make.

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.  How do we upgrade declaratively?  I
could be missing something big here! :)

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature