bug#34934: deeptools is not reproducible

[Gábor Boskovits]

Hello Ludo,

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. márc. 23., Szo, 
18:01):
>
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > │ │ │ │ ├── tree.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
> > │ │ │ │ │ ├── 
> > /gnu/store/02iklp4swqs0ipxhg5x9b2shmj6b30h1-binutils-2.31.1/bin/readelf 
> > --wide --dynamic {}
> > │ │ │ │ │ │ @@ -2,15 +2,15 @@
> > │ │ │ │ │ │  Dynamic section at offset 0xcd90 contains 30 entries:
> > │ │ │ │ │ │    Tag        Type                         Name/Value
> > │ │ │ │ │ │   0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: 
> > [libz.so.1]
> > │ │ │ │ │ │   0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: 
> > [libpython3.7m.so.1.0]
> > │ │ │ │ │ │   0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: 
> > [libgcc_s.so.1]
> > │ │ │ │ │ │   0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: 
> > [libpthread.so.0]
> > │ │ │ │ │ │   0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: 
> > [libc.so.6]
> > │ │ │ │ │ │ - 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath: 
> > [/gnu/store/9z98cvjm7p7z21xdid1ryydxy5vyz6wr-python-3.7.0/lib:/gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib:/gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib:/gnu/store/nq4lsyipmfb0q7g26ra45rwwqrh3x8zw-zlib-1.2.11/lib:/gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.5.0/../../..]
> > │ │ │ │ │ │ + 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)            Library runpath:
> > [/gnu/store/b7fqhszxl02g6pfm3vw6b3cjz472qrly-python-3.7.0/lib:/gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib:/gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib:/gnu/store/nq4lsyipmfb0q7g26ra45rwwqrh3x8zw-zlib-1.2.11/lib:/gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.5.0/../../..]
>
> Hmmm, what’s the difference between these two RUNPATHs?
>

At first They looked ver similar to me, but the hash of the first
python-3.7.0 differs, right at the beginning. I could not dive deeper,
but maybe this can help you out.

> Ludo’.
>
>
>

Best regards,
g_bor