[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content has
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Oct 2017 14:22:08 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:09:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at:
>
>
> https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s
It seems to me that there are several reasons someone may choose not to
use substitutes. Some of those reasons (reproducibility and security
concerns) are obviated for fixed-output derivations like upstream
sources, and I think it would be fine to still use substitutes for these
derivations.
But the motivations of privacy, self-sufficiency, etc are not addressed
by that idea.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, (continued)
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/10/02
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/03
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Leo Famulari, 2017/10/03
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/10/04
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Leo Famulari, 2017/10/04
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/10/04
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/10/05
- bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/10/05
bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/02