Re: Synchronizing synopses with the Womb

[Ludovic Courtès]

address@hidden (Karl Berry) skribis:

>     For Nano, I’m not sure it makes sense to mention Pico (Pico wasn’t free,
>     right?); instead we have "A small, user-friendly console text editor".
>
> Agreed.  Except, trivial, there is no need for "A" here.  So I changed
> it to:
>
> doc-summary: Small, user-friendly console text editor

Perfect.

[...]

> So how about:
> doc-summary: Hash library of database functions compatible with traditional 
> dbm

Looks good to me!

> I can't say I'm enthused about verbose "key/value" instead of "hash" --
> are we not allowed to use technical terms any more :)?  Either would be
> ok, but key/value will make my line >79 chars :).

It’s just that, as a gdbm user, the abstraction I manipulate is
key/value associations.  But what you suggest is fine with me.  :-)

> P.S. Did you talk with Brandon about synchronizing the guix/gsrc
> long(er) descriptions?  He was going to write you ...

Oh, not yet.  I had overlooked the fact that GSRC also has longer
descriptions.

It would be good to synchronize before Guix is added to the Translation
Project.

Thanks!

Ludo’.