Re: Netpbm

[Ludovic Courtès]

Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:

> Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2013 schrieb Andreas Enge:
>> This is more annoying, I will investigate and try to remove non-free
>> parts.
>
> Now I remember, the one marked non-free is already not distributed; 
> instead, the binary explains how to get the real code. I dropped it since 
> it advertises non-free software.
>
> Of those without license according to debian, two actually are marked as 
> public domain; I dropped all others.

OK, great.

> Now it just remains to decide what to put into the license field.

Seems like it’s either GPLv2+ or GPLv2-only.  Is there a v2-only file?

Thanks!

Ludo’.