[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distro name
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Distro name |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:36:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> However, I’ve come to think that we don’t necessarily need a separate
> name for the distro, but we do need a name for the module name space.
>
> The obvious solution would be (gnu ...). There’d be modules like
> (gnu packages openssl), which does not mean that OpenSSL is a GNU
> package, but I think that should be clear in this context. Anyway,
> that’s the option that I like the most currently.
It seems we went on discussing a distro name, but that turned out not to
solve the module name space issue. :-)
So I’ll rename the (distro ...) modules to (gnu ...), because that’s
nicer and more meaningful (“a distro of the GNU system”).
Thanks!
Ludo’.
- Re: Distro name, (continued)
Re: Distro name, Nikita Karetnikov, 2013/01/02
Re: Distro name,
Ludovic Courtès <=
Re: Distro name, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/01/17