bug-guile
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#32786: (system* ...) call somehow interferes with atomic-box on armv


From: Mark H Weaver
Subject: bug#32786: (system* ...) call somehow interferes with atomic-box on armv7l
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:22:13 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Hi,

Михаил Бахтерев <address@hidden> writes:

> I've tested the patch (i've applied it to the v2.2.4 source code). The
> test sample works now as expected with both test «payloads»: (sleep
> N-seconds) and (system* "any" "command" "here") calls.

Thanks for letting us know the results of your testing, this is very
helpful.  I just pushed a similar fix (same code, improved comments) to
the stable-2.2 branch, commit 2d09e0513fc11e2305077ba3653f6e4c2f266ddb,
which will be in the upcoming guile-2.2.5 release.

    Thanks,
      Mark


>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> - MB. Respectfully
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:49:23AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks for the additional details.  I was able to reproduce the bug, and
>> I believe I now see the problem.
>> 
>> 'atomic-box-compare-and-swap!' is implemented using
>> 'atomic_compare_exchange_weak' (if available), but neglects to handle
>> the case where 'atomic_compare_exchange_weak' may spuriously fail.  In
>> that case, the box is left unchanged, although the observed value was
>> equal to the expected value.
>> 
>> What's happening here is that the 'atomic-box-compare-and-swap!' in
>> 'sleep-loop' fails spuriously, leaving the box in state #:accepted
>> although it returns #:accepted as its result.  When the main loop
>> discovers this, it changes the state to #:need-to-sleep, although the
>> thread has already ended.
>> 
>> To confirm this hypothesis, I added a print statement to the main loop
>> showing the state of the box that it observed during the protocol
>> exchange, and indeed it sees #:accepted the first time it checks, and
>> #:need-to-sleep in all later iterations.
>> 
>> I've attached a proposed patch that I hope will fix this problem.  If
>> you'd be willing to test it, I'd be grateful, but otherwise I'll try to
>> test it in the next week or so.  My access to armv7l boxes is somewhat
>> limited.
>> 
>> Thanks for this report.
>> 
>>       Mark
>> 
>> 
>
>> From 958d37686a9ac65f48cb2ca32a341cf182c24b5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Mark H Weaver <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 01:00:11 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] UNTESTED: Fix 'atomic-box-compare-and-swap!'.
>> 
>> Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/32786>.
>> 
>> 'scm_atomic_compare_and_swap_scm' uses 'atomic_compare_exchange_weak' if
>> it's available on the host platform.  'atomic_compare_exchange_weak' may
>> fail spuriously, leaving the atomic object unchanged even when it
>> contained the expected value.  'atomic-box-compare-and-swap!' uses
>> 'scm_atomic_compare_and_swap_scm' without checking its return value, and
>> therefore may return the expected value while leaving the box unchanged.
>> This contradicts the documentation, which explicitly states that "you
>> can know if the swap worked by checking if the return value is 'eq?' to
>> EXPECTED.".
>> 
>> * libguile/atomic.c (scm_atomic_box_compare_and_swap_x): If
>> 'scm_atomic_compare_and_swap_scm' returns false and the observed value
>> is equal to 'expected', then try again.
>> * libguile/vm-engine.c (atomic-box-compare-and-swap!): Ditto.
>> ---
>>  libguile/atomic.c    | 13 +++++++++----
>>  libguile/vm-engine.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/libguile/atomic.c b/libguile/atomic.c
>> index 950874030..504643912 100644
>> --- a/libguile/atomic.c
>> +++ b/libguile/atomic.c
>> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> -/* Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> +/* Copyright (C) 2016, 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>   *
>>   * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>   * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License
>> @@ -95,10 +95,15 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_atomic_box_compare_and_swap_x,
>>              "if the return value is @code{eq?} to @var{expected}.")
>>  #define FUNC_NAME s_scm_atomic_box_compare_and_swap_x
>>  {
>> +  SCM result = expected;
>> +
>>    SCM_VALIDATE_ATOMIC_BOX (1, box);
>> -  scm_atomic_compare_and_swap_scm (scm_atomic_box_loc (box),
>> -                                   &expected, desired);
>> -  return expected;
>> +  while (!scm_atomic_compare_and_swap_scm (scm_atomic_box_loc (box),
>> +                                           &result, desired)
>> +         && scm_is_eq (result, expected))
>> +    {
>> +    }
>> +  return result;
>>  }
>>  #undef FUNC_NAME
>>  
>> diff --git a/libguile/vm-engine.c b/libguile/vm-engine.c
>> index 19ff3e498..9650e33eb 100644
>> --- a/libguile/vm-engine.c
>> +++ b/libguile/vm-engine.c
>> @@ -3868,16 +3868,19 @@ VM_NAME (scm_i_thread *thread, struct scm_vm *vp,
>>      {
>>        scm_t_uint16 dst, box;
>>        scm_t_uint32 expected, desired;
>> -      SCM scm_box, scm_expected;
>> +      SCM scm_box, scm_expected, scm_result;
>>        UNPACK_12_12 (op, dst, box);
>>        UNPACK_24 (ip[1], expected);
>>        UNPACK_24 (ip[2], desired);
>>        scm_box = SP_REF (box);
>>        VM_VALIDATE_ATOMIC_BOX (scm_box, "atomic-box-compare-and-swap!");
>> -      scm_expected = SP_REF (expected);
>> -      scm_atomic_compare_and_swap_scm (scm_atomic_box_loc (scm_box),
>> -                                       &scm_expected, SP_REF (desired));
>> -      SP_SET (dst, scm_expected);
>> +      scm_result = scm_expected = SP_REF (expected);
>> +      while (!scm_atomic_compare_and_swap_scm (scm_atomic_box_loc (scm_box),
>> +                                               &scm_result, SP_REF 
>> (desired))
>> +             && scm_is_eq (scm_result, scm_expected))
>> +        {
>> +        }
>> +      SP_SET (dst, scm_result);
>>        NEXT (3);
>>      }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.19.0
>> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]