bug#30154: [PATCH] web: Add http-patch.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Arun Isaac <address@hidden> skribis:

> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> If you think it's not a good idea to include http-patch in guile, maybe
>>> we can export define-http-verb and/or request so that it is easy for
>>> users to create their own custom HTTP methods. WDYT?
>>
>> I would prefer to export the 'request' procedure from (web client),
>> although it should probably be exported as a different name, maybe
>> 'http-request'.  Would that work for you?
>
> Yes, exporting 'request' alone would serve my purpose, although
> 'define-http-verb' would make my script much shorter. But, I'll leave it
> to your judgement. Should I send a new patch exporting 'request' alone?

Could you do that?  The ‘request’ procedure can simply be made public
and otherwise left unchanged, but we’d need a docstring and an entry in
the manual.  Can you take a look?

I’ll happily apply the patch afterwards, and I promise you won’t have to
wait as much as you did so far!  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.