bug#13485: wrong warning for format ~!

[Ian Price]

Ian Price <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm currently looking through the format docs to see if any others are
> mishandled, and will post a patch later.

So, having went through all of the docs for format, I think I've handled
all of the sequences correctly (except for the iteration ones, which
were already done, and I never double-checked). The two main issues were
sequences that don't take an argument updating the count, and some
sequences were not treated insensitively.

~^ confused me a little, but I think I have the correct behaviour for it

Ludovic,
are there test cases for this? I'm not sure where to look

-- 
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"

0001-Fix-argument-count-for-various-format-string-escape-.patch
Description: format warnings patch