[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:13:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Bruno,
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> However, why do you have -Wall in CPPFLAGS, instead of CFLAGS, in the
>> first place? :-)
>
> Because CPPFLAGS=-Wall is shorter to type than CFLAGS="-g -O2 -Wall",
> and I know that -Wall has no effect when linking a program or library.
Sure, but it’s not a cpp flag, right?
What I mean is that we won’t prevent you from shooting yourself in the
foot. ;-)
I only ever use CPPFLAGS for -I flags and can’t think of other likely
uses.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/19
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/19
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Andy Wingo, 2011/02/20
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/20
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ken Raeburn, 2011/02/20
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/22
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/22
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/23
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/27
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Bruno Haible, 2011/02/27
- Re: GUILE_CFLAGS contains warning options, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/02/27