Re: Segmentation fault

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi Neil,

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

>> (I had forgotten about it, which may be an indication that we should
>> really start using the bug tracker.)
>
> What would that involve?

Not much actually.  Just mention it in the relevant pieces of
documentation.  The bug tracker automatically sends emails to
`bug-guile' when new bugs are reported or when the status of existing
bugs changes.  We can also assign a bug to a specific developer, which
can help coordinate efforts.

> Yes, I meant to do that but forgot.  No need for with-output-to-port
> though; just need to change the second arg of display-backtrace to
> (%make-void-port "w").

Right.

> I looked at that, but couldn't work out what unmemoize-expr's args
> should be.  Also, this would make the test depart further from the
> reported scenario.  So I think best to stick with using
> display-backtrace.

OK.

> Yes, I'll do that.  There's a couple of places in the tests that use
> debug-enable/disable like this, so it's worth adding a
> with-debugging-evaluator form to (test-suite lib).

Yes, makes sense.

Can you also add a `NEWS' entry?

Thanks,
Ludovic.