[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: leaky let*-bindings?
From: |
Julian Graham |
Subject: |
Re: leaky let*-bindings? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:26:30 -0500 |
Hi Kevin,
Wow, you're right -- and I'm doing that in a lot of other places,
too. Well, I'll just change those to... I dunno, something like (list
'*FRAGMENT*). Thank you so much for taking the time to check that out
for me!
Cheers,
Julian
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:31:23 +1100, Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> wrote:
> Julian Graham <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > (*FRAGMENT* (@ (sdom:owner-document #<procedure #f ()>)))
> >
> > ...but when you run it after documentadoptnode-14, it's:
> >
> > (*FRAGMENT* (http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml:acronym ...
>
> I notice you return a constant list '(*FRAGMENT*) for the
> sdom:node-type-document-fragment case. Do you modify the cdr of that
> directly (ie. with `set-cdr!')? If so then that constant will be
> changed in the code, which is very possibly not what you want.
>