[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images
From: |
Rodrigo Valiña Gutiérrez |
Subject: |
Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:43:35 +0100 |
>> They also may not match if virtual address != physical address, but as
>> we do not establish any address translation when launching image, this
>> probably is going to fail. Still would be good to have this assumption
>> explicitly listed in multiboot2 manual.
>
> I think that we should state in multiboot2 spec that physical address ==
> virtual address in ELF.
>
That may be true (that is going to fail) for entry point address, but
please note that many kernels have the entry point and bootstrap code
in a section/segment with virtual == physical, but then setup address
translation and jump to another sections/segments with virtual !=
physical addresses.
- "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Ahmed, Safayet (GE Global Research, US), 2017/03/17
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Andrei Borzenkov, 2017/03/19
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Daniel Kiper, 2017/03/22
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Andrei Borzenkov, 2017/03/22
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Daniel Kiper, 2017/03/22
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images,
Rodrigo Valiña Gutiérrez <=
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Daniel Kiper, 2017/03/22
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Andrei Borzenkov, 2017/03/23
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Rodrigo V. G., 2017/03/23
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Andrei Borzenkov, 2017/03/26
- Re: "ELF-Symbols" tag for relocatable images, Andrei Borzenkov, 2017/03/23