[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation
From: |
Aharon Robbins |
Subject: |
bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jan 2014 21:24:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 |
Hi.
> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 10:56:29 -0800
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> To: Aharon Robbins <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Subject: Re: bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation
>
> Aharon Robbins wrote:
> > I don't think it's right to remove this code, but I don't know how
> > to test it to prove that, either.
>
> Perhaps Norihiro Tanaka's recent patch makes this question moot; see:
>
> http://bugs.gnu.org/16421
Yes, I think so. It keeps the non-GREP code. If y'all are going to apply
it then I'd be happy with that.
Thanks!
Arnold
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Aharon Robbins, 2014/01/17
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/17
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Aharon Robbins, 2014/01/18
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/20
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Aharon Robbins, 2014/01/20
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/21
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Jim Meyering, 2014/01/21
- bug#16421: bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/21
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Aharon Robbins, 2014/01/25
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation, Paul Eggert, 2014/01/25
- bug#16481: dfa.c and Rational Range Interpretation,
Aharon Robbins <=