Re: A new module: bitset

[Akim Demaille]

> Le 28 nov. 2018 à 06:03, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> Akim Demaille wrote:
>> What do you propose?
> 
> A simple, general solution is to use only malloc/calloc/realloc, and to have 
> bitset functions fail when they exhaust memory.

Then I guess the current state does what you want.  If you
don't want the two occurrences of xmalloc in bitset, define
OBSTACK_CHUNK_ALLOC to what you want.