[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:31:24 -0700 |
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Gisle Vanem <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>>> From the output of that mingw configure run, it appears they are not
>>> declared -- at least not in any header included by this particular
>>> test program:
>>>
>>> checking whether program_invocation_name is declared... no
>>> checking whether program_invocation_short_name is declared... no
>>
>> There are other options; both MinGW and MSVC have:
>> extern char** __argv;
>>
>> in their <stdlib.h>.
>
> Thanks. I will extend getprogname to detect/use that, when possible.
I've pushed the attached, which also adds a minimal test case:
getprogname-__argv.diff
Description: Text document
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Jim Meyering, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Pino Toscano, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Jim Meyering, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Jim Meyering, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Pino Toscano, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, T J, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Pino Toscano, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Jim Meyering, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Gisle Vanem, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Jim Meyering, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Gisle Vanem, 2016/09/07
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Jim Meyering, 2016/09/07
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] New getprogname module, Jim Meyering, 2016/09/08