|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] file-has-acl: new module, split from acl |
Date: | Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:28:28 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
On 04/28/2015 04:45 AM, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
I would rather have gnulib define XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS and XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT when the kernel headers don't provide them:
I don't know the Linux kernel that well, but if it sounds good to you....
I worried that gl_FILE_HAS_ACL might be invoked either before, or after, gl_FUNC_ACL. Your message is confusing, because the first part of it implies the former, and the middle part implies the latter. If we know one of the two alternatives is impossible, then yes we can simplify the code accordingly.Function gl_FILE_HAS_ACL depends on gl_FUNC_ACL to be called afterwards, and gl_FUNC_ACL does get called through the gnulib module dependencies. Now why is LIB_HAS_ACL being set in both functions?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |