[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Licensing of dummy.c
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Licensing of dummy.c |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:53:02 +0200 |
Karl Berry wrote:
> regexprops-generic. The last one seems to be a mistake,
> it should be fdl
>
> I seem to recall that the issue there was that regexprops-generic is
> both documentation and code. Therefore neither GPL nor GFDL work, and
> dual licensing seems like far too much trouble.
>
> The "unlimited" license text would also be ok, but I don't see that it's
> worth changing.
>
> The alloca module
> seems non-trivial but marked as public domain in the code.
>
> If it's still the same alloca, that is how it was originally written and
> released (independently of GNU), decades ago.
Yes, it is still that same alloca.c.
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Reuben Thomas, 2012/09/13
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Simon Josefsson, 2012/09/13
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Reuben Thomas, 2012/09/13
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Simon Josefsson, 2012/09/13
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Reuben Thomas, 2012/09/13
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Karl Berry, 2012/09/13
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Simon Josefsson, 2012/09/13
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Jim Meyering, 2012/09/14
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c, Simon Josefsson, 2012/09/14
- Re: Licensing of dummy.c,
Jim Meyering <=