[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Partial patch
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: Partial patch |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:05:56 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 SUSE/3.0.8 Thunderbird/3.0.8 |
On 11/17/10 09:07, Eric Blake wrote:
> Anyways, you can always use a directed push to say exactly what you
> mean, rather than relying on the no-arg 'git push' defaults. Assuming
> your local branch names match upstream:
>
> git push origin topic/libposix
OK, that looks easy:
> $ git push origin topic/libposix
> Everything up-to-date
> $
OK, maybe not so much. I don't see any indications of a
successful push, so I am guessing I did not push anything.
>> To ssh://address@hidden/srv/git/gnulib
>> e633b39..2d39e49 topic/libposix -> topic/libposix
>> ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast-forward)
>> error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://address@hidden/srv/git/gnulib'
>
> Yep - you've now rebased your libposix branch, but the 'git push'
> defaults are still trying to push master as well. Changing those
> defaults, or being more specific with your push request, will avoid that
> problem.
Have I actually pushed and not noticed? 8-O
- Partial patch, Bruce Korb, 2010/11/16
- Re: Partial patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/11/17
- Re: Partial patch, Bruce Korb, 2010/11/17
- Re: Partial patch, Eric Blake, 2010/11/17
- Re: Partial patch, Bruce Korb, 2010/11/17
- Re: Partial patch, Eric Blake, 2010/11/17
- Re: Partial patch,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: Partial patch, Eric Blake, 2010/11/17
- Re: Partial patch, Bruce Korb, 2010/11/17
- Re: Partial patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/11/17