[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix)
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix) |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 01:50:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Bruce Korb wrote:
> I'll need the `pkg-config --libs libposix` output
> to result in all the stuff libposix (aka gnulib for posix) is going
> to require.
Really? Why not rely on the dependencies of the shared library libposix.so?
> I am open to suggestions, but my first guess is
> going to be to write some script that strips out all the
> names by grepping for '^libposix_la.*_LIBM\)' from Makefile.am
libtool has already collected this information. I would try to extract it
from libposix.la.
If that does not work, why don't you just write a Makefile rule that
essentially does an
echo $(libposix_la_LDFLAGS)
?
Bruno
- Re: libposix, (continued)
- Re: libposix, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/04
- Re: libposix, Eric Blake, 2010/10/04
- Re: libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/04
- Re: libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/04
- gnulib-tool and shared libraries (was: Re: libposix), Bruno Haible, 2010/10/04
- -no-undefined (was: libposix), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruno Haible, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruno Haible, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruce Korb, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix),
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruce Korb, 2010/10/06
Re: libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/05