Re: pmccabe2html: more nits; build-aux confusion

[Reuben Thomas]

On 21 September 2010 13:38, Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 1. The example Makefile.am code has "lib/" rather than "src/" in the
>> path to the source code, even though it's clearly the package source
>> that is to be analysed, not the gnulib library code.
>
> This is because it is an example, and the projects I used it for had the
> "real" code in lib/ (and the gnulib code in gl/ or similar).  Maybe the
> example could be changed to use src/ as that may be more common, but
> still, it is an example snippet that needs to be adapted by the
> maintainer anyway...

Indeed. Maybe src/ is rather commoner as a source directory?

Attached, two patches, one to s/lib/src/ and one to fix a typo that an
earlier patch somehow introduced (s/PACKAG/PACKAGE/). Sorry about the
latter.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org

0001-Set-cut_dir-properly-and-add-mode-line-for-Emacs.patch
Description: Binary data

0002-Use-src-not-lib-as-root-of-source-in-example-Makefil.patch
Description: Binary data