[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_FUNC_ALLOCA shouldn't define prototype
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: AC_FUNC_ALLOCA shouldn't define prototype |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:38:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > So, I don't understand how you see a "conflict".
>
> The conflicting declarations are a result of the default namespace
> containing _NETBSD_SOURCE if no (other) standard compliance macro is
> set.
Still, I don't see how you can get a conflict with <stdlib.h> if the test
code does not include <stdlib.h>, and your report is very vague.
Can you please give a reproducible test case? This means,
- Show a configure.ac that leads to the conflict.
- Which autoconf version did you use?
- Show how you invoke configure?
- Which compiler is being used?
- On which platform is this (FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD)? and which version?
- Did it say "checking for alloca... yes" or "checking for alloca... no"?
- What error messages did you see, from which tool, at which step?
- Did you get a conflict in your program, when it included <stdlib.h>,
after configure had run?
Bruno