|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: proposal: module 'accept4' |
Date: | Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:22:51 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3 |
On 08/22/2009 11:39 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi, Here's the proposed module for function 'accept4'. It does not define the macro SOCK_CLOEXEC. I think this macro should be replaced by a separate module, that would then also influence socket(), socketpair() - and what about connect()? Opinions? Objections?
This can be committed as is but it is not enough. You have to always use a replacement (thus define the emulation as rpl_accept4) and check whether accept4 works at runtime (and similarly for pipe2) and fall back to accept+fcntl if it gives ENOSYS.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |