bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: update-copyright vs. compressed years


From: Karl Berry
Subject: Re: update-copyright vs. compressed years
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:59:49 -0500

    +Copyright (C) 1996, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2007, 2008-2009 Free Software

Perhaps update-copyright could detect the convention being used, to
placate Jim :).  Failing that, pushing Jim's willful decision to
compress years into update-copyright seems like the wrong move to me :).

I've never seen anything legal that implies that ranges are ok; just the
opposite.  Of course I agree with Jim that the chances of it ever
causing a problem in practice are epsilon.  But still ... one way is
clearly ok, the other not.

karl




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]