[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: malloc(0) problem again
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: malloc(0) problem again |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:15:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> AC_FUNC_MALLOC should define malloc to rpl_malloc and
> the code from the malloc module should be used and fix this issue, no?
My modules don't use AC_FUNC_MALLOC. From a performance perspective,
I see no point in adding an extra function call for every malloc invocation,
while only few among these invocations can actually be called with a zero
argument. From a standards perspective, I stick with ISO C99 and POSIX.
Bruno