Re: Typo/oddity in realpath.texi

[Bruno Haible]

Hi,

Reuben Thomas wrote:
> "Gnulib provides a module @samp{canonicalize-lgpl}"
> 
> since there's a canonicalize and a canonicalize-lgpl module, shouldn't it 
> just say "a module @samp{canonicalize}", and users can make the usual guess 
> that there might be an LGPL version?

The 'canonicalize' module is farther away from the realpath() function:
Different API, and not usable in libraries due to xalloc(). I think mentioning
'canonicalize-lgpl' is therefore more adequate here.

Bruno