|
From: | Karl Berry |
Subject: | Re: c-strtod: improve error checking |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:58:52 -0600 |
> I suppose NULL isn't necessarily defined Hard to imagine. POSIX explicitly mentions (locale_t)0 I am surprised. I thought 0 was supposed to be a valid null pointer in all contexts, without casting.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |