[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: winsock.c split
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: winsock.c split |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:16:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> I have pushed this, but would appreciate testing and review.
>
> Everything's fine, except the change of doc/posix-functions/close.texi.
> (close() sets errno also under Windows, only closesocket() does not.)
Oh, I didn't know some Windows function set errno... sigh.
>> In particular, I'm not sure the close module is handled correctly.
>
> It's correct.
>
> I'm proposing this addendum, mostly simplifications.
Looks fine, please push and I can prepare a new gsasl release that use
all all these changes.
/Simon
- new module 'ioctl', Bruno Haible, 2008/10/09
- Re: new module 'ioctl', Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/10
- test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/10/20
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- winsock.c split, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: winsock.c split, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/25
- Re: winsock.c split, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/25
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Bruno Haible, 2008/10/21
- Re: test-poll vs ioctl, Simon Josefsson, 2008/10/21